Has no clue what he is talking about, and must go round with his eyes closed, or obviously doesn’t visit any of the tourist hotspots anymore. May not be mass tourism like many other places in Europe, but certainly a huge problem that isn’t being managed.
The issue of overtourism, which has been on the agenda, was brought to the regional parliament on a morning in which investments and ideas in the areas of Economy, Tourism and Culture are in focus.
The subject was first addressed by Burno Melim, from the PSD, who, referring to the infrastructures and entrances, wanted to know how these were adapted for the management of land use planning, asking Eduardo Jesus to clarify whether or not there is mass tourism.
Later, Sara Madalena, with greater emphasis, once again confronted the government official with the same problem. The CDS/PP deputy wanted to know what the Regional Government intends to do to resolve what she says is the “saturation” of tourist attractions.
The centrist also took the opportunity to ask about the recovery of the rural landscape, one of the measures proposed by her party, as well as the old regional roads.
Regarding these aspects, Eduardo Jesus assured that Madeira does not have “excess tourism”, arguing that the Region is “fortunately, a long way from this reality”, speaking of calculations of overload indicators by international organizations. As he pointed out, excess occurs when this indicator is between 120 and 130, stating that Madeira does not reach 40.
He even said that “the problem has to do with the management of the territory”, referring the matter to Rafaela Fernandes, who will be at the Legislative Assembly of Madeira today. And regarding the positions taken in this area, alluding to the impact that they may have on the issuing markets, Eduardo Jesus even said that “we are shooting ourselves in the foot”.
The minister pointed to the communication campaign that has been carried out by Madeira Tourism with a view to promoting alternative trails, as an alternative to the most congested routes, suggesting that the choice should fall on the less popular routes.